Rod Sullivan, Supervisor, Johnson County, Iowa

Previous Posts

Archives


rodsullivan.org

SULLIVAN'S SALVOS

February 22, 2018

Sullivan’s Salvos     2/27/18



In this edition:


*Prairie Preview
*Crisis Center Pancakes
*MH/DS Layoffs
*Did You Know?



*Prairie Preview
Bur Oak Land Trust presents Prairie Preview XXXV, a free, open to the public environmental forum that traditionally attracts over 200 attendees. Exhibitors will be set up by 6:30 p.m.

Mark Hirsch, author of That Tree will be this year’s speaker beginning at 7:30 p.m. His talk is titled “Shades of wisdom, lessons learned from a lonely Bur Oak.”

A $25 45-minute photo workshop – A simple approach to smart phone photography, will be given by Mark at 4:30 pm. Mark will also have a meet and greet and book signing.

More than 45 exhibitors will be set up to showcase their organization, provide information and answer any questions that attendees may have. Refreshments provided by Four Seasons Garden Club.

Sponsored by Iowa Living Roadway Trust, Project GREEN, Western Fraternal Life, and City of Coralville. Sponsorship opportunities are still available. For information please contact Tammy Wright, Bur Oak Land Trust executive director, at info@buroaklandtrust.org or 319-338-7030.



*Crisis Center Pancakes
Saturday, March 5, from 7 a.m. to 1 p.m. at Our Redeemer Lutheran Church, 2301 E. Court Street in Iowa City.

Tickets are available at the door - $6 for adults, $3 for children. Breakfast includes all-you-can-eat pancakes, sausage, coffee, and milk, in addition to gourmet pancake toppings.

This is The Crisis Center's biggest annual fundraising event! Please come support local families in need and get a wonderful breakfast at the same time!



*MH/DS Layoffs
         If you read Salvos regularly, you know that I used to work in the Medicaid program. Medicaid is a tremendously important program, caring for the poorest and sickest among us. You have heard me complain at length about the Governor’s decision to privatize Iowa’s Medicaid program. (Privatization is also known as turning it over to Managed Care Organizations, or MCOs.) Privatization has led to predictably disastrous results for the poorest, sickest Iowans and those who care about them.

         There are other people also hurt by these changes that I have yet to mention. Unfortunately, on February 28, Johnson County says goodbye to most of our Medicaid Case Managers. We will be down to about ten employees in a Department that was once home to 30. And the Governor’s decision to move to MCOs is 100% to blame.

         Let me back up and explain what a Medicaid Case Manager does. Many of the people who access Medicaid are not in a position to line up their own services. Many Medicaid recipients have dementia, or serious and persistent mental illness, or intellectual disabilities, or a brain injury, or one of many other conditions that can affect decision-making. In these situations, a Medicaid Case Manager walks the client through her choices, helps her apply for services, refers her to community resources, and then monitors those services for quality and cost effectiveness. Medicaid Case Managers serve as advocates for people who may be unable to advocate for themselves.

         Johnson County has provided assistance to people in need since the County was formed in the 1830s. So when Medicaid Case Management came about, Johnson was one of dozens of counties that went into the Medicaid Case Management business.

         In some counties, private nonprofits did the Medicaid Case Management. In some counties, the Department of Human Services (DHS) did it. In most counties, the counties themselves provided the service. And this was a really good arrangement. Since private nonprofits did most of the services, you had a dispassionate third party who could judge how things were going. Similarly, since most Medicaid funding runs through DHS, county-based Case Managers maintained a critical professional distance.

         Medicaid Case Managers would each have a caseload; rules changed over time, but this caseload was generally between 25 and 45 clients. Medicaid Case Managers were required to have a couple contacts per month with each of their clients in order to bill for the service. A great deal of documentation was required in order to be able to bill; Medicaid Case Managers were required to write detailed “narratives” to describe what they did with their clients.

As you might imagine, some clients required very little effort. Other clients called several times per day, every day. Still others required the Medicaid Case Manager to literally look under bridges to find them. Some faced serious problems like addictions, sexual abuse, and any other issue you can imagine. The job could be a lot of things, but boring it was not!

         The Medicaid Case Management system was historically victimized by poor decisions in the Iowa Legislature and poor leadership at Iowa DHS. Those in charge routinely made decisions that overemphasized paperwork and underemphasized the social work function. It became more and more bureaucratic, and more and more difficult just to do the job. Still, most Medicaid Case Managers stuck with it, because they legitimately care about helping those in need.

         Then along came the MCOs. These organizations do not give a damn about anyone but their shareholders. So the MCOs refuse to pay Johnson and other counties to provide Medicaid Case Management. In some cases, they simply decide the client does not “need” the service. In other cases, the MCOs say they will provide the service “in-house.”

         This made it impossible for Johnson County to maintain all the Medicaid Case Management jobs. Some people saw the writing on the wall, and there has been a slow trickle of employees leaving over the past year. Finally, the MCOs demanded all cases be turned over to them. Johnson County was forced to refer to the layoff provisions in the contract we had bargained with our Medicaid Case Managers (a unit of AFSMCE). Per the contract provisions, the Medicaid Case Managers would get 20 working days’ notice, then be laid off. Notice occurred February 1st. The last day of work for these folks is February 28th. It sucks.

         As I mentioned at the beginning of this piece, privatization has been horrible for people who use Medicaid and their families. Through it all, Johnson County’s Medicaid Case Managers have worked tirelessly to make a bad situation better. They have spent hours consoling people, and many additional hours trying to figure things out. Through it all, they have kept the needs of the clients first. They have been thorough and professional. And now their jobs are gone, a casualty of the Governor putting public money in private pockets.

         My hat is off to our Medicaid Case Managers. These are great employees and great people who deserve so much better. My thanks go out to them, and also to Johnson County’s Human Resources Department and AFSCME, who made a difficult situation much better with their professionalism.

         So, what can you do? The answer is simple: VOTE OUT THIS GOVERNOR! She needs to be held accountable!



*DID YOU KNOW?  One in Six Iowans is served by a Medicaid program. (Source: Iowa Department of Human Services.)



Anyone interested in learning more about County government should take a look at the County website-

"Sullivan’s Salvos" is sent once per week to any interested party. It will give a brief update on issues of interest to Johnson County residents.

These messages come solely from Rod Sullivan, and neither represents the viewpoints of the whole Board of Supervisors nor those of groups or individuals otherwise mentioned.

If you do NOT want the weekly E-mail, simply reply to this message, and type "unsubscribe" in the subject line.

If you know anyone else who might be interested, just forward this message. They can E-mail me at rodsullivan@mchsi.com with "subscribe" in the subject line.

As always, feel free to contact me at 354-7199 or rodsullivan@mchsi.com. I look forward to serving you!

---Rod





February 15, 2018

Sullivan’s Salvos     2/20/18



In this edition:


*RIP Tom Walz
*DVIP Souper Bowl
*Bowl For Kids Sake
*FY2019 Budget Public Hearing
*Real Iowans in Johnson County!
*Did You Know?



*RIP Tom Walz
         My friend, mentor, and professor Tom Walz passed away this week. In addition to serving decades as a UI Professor of Social Work, Tom was the founder of Bill’s Coffee Shop, Uptown Bill’s, and Extend the Dream.

         Tom often asked me back to the School of Social Work to his Public Policy classes, in which he would absolutely give me hell for failing to do enough for people who had various disadvantages. But he did so with a smile on his face, and when he finished, he would tell me he was proud of me.

         I always thought Tom was best summed up by a series of photos on the wall of the family home. They got a family portrait every year, and these photos hung on the wall in chronological order. One year there would be two African American girls; the next, an older man who used a wheelchair. Two years later, the girls were back, and so was a young man with Downs Syndrome. Bill Sackter came and went. It went on like that every year – new faces, old faces - everyone was a part of Tom’s family!

         RIP, Tom. I know you didn’t like giving or receiving grades, but you just got an A+.



*DVIP Souper Bowl
         The Domestic Violence Intervenion Program (DVIP) is holding its 21st Annual Souper Bowl fundraiser on Thursday, February 22 from 5:30-7:30 PM at the Clarion Highlander.

         From the Souper Bowl Facebook Page: In the chill of February in Iowa, we are reminded of the need to break bread, share conversation, and support our neighbors. As our client, Angela, expressed with tears streaming down her face as she leaned over to her advocate, “All of these people are here for us? I had no idea. I have felt so alone in this for so long. Thank you.”

With your support, we are able to provide much-needed resources to those most vulnerable within our community while sharing amazing food with our neighbors in a family-friendly atmosphere! Your donation goes directly to serving victim/survivors within our community!

Guests choose a unique, often one of a kind, donated bowl, and eat an unlimited amount of amazing soup from area restaurants while conversing with other supporters to local music. The proceeds from this event provide much-needed funding to keep the doors of our emergency shelter open, our advocates in the community, and help individuals and families to find safety and dignity when they most need it.



*Bowl For Kids’ Sake
The Sullivan for Supervisor team is once again raising money for Big Brothers Big Sisters of Johnson County by Bowling For Kids’ Sake on Saturday, February 24.

Bowl for Kids' Sake is Big Brothers Big Sisters largest national fundraiser, raising over $20 million annually for children in need across the country. Because of Bowl for Kids' Sake, more Bigs and Littles can be paired up, more friendships can be created and improved outlooks on life can be started.




*FY2019 Budget Public Hearing
The Johnson County Board of Supervisors has approved the Fiscal Year 2019 Budget Estimate. Detailed information about the budget will be presented at a public hearing at 5:30 p.m. on Wednesday, Feb. 21, at the Johnson County Administration Building, 913 South Dubuque Street, Iowa City, in the second floor boardroom. A reception with refreshments will begin at 5 p.m.

A complete packet of the budget estimate is available at www.johnson-county.com on the Finance Department page under “FY19 Budget.” The following link will take you directly to the tax calculation worksheet: http://www.johnson-county.com/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=23748.

The budget is also available for viewing at the Iowa Department of Management’s public budget report website at www.iowaonline.state.ia.us/localbudgets/default.aspx?cmd=gotopublicsite.
Questions may be directed to the Johnson County Finance Department at 319-688-8095.



*Real Iowans in Johnson County!
         I often hear political journalists, Democratic candidates, and Democratic campaign operatives make statements like, “Johnson County does not matter,” or “No statewide candidate can come from Johnson County,” or “We are going to talk to REAL Iowans, not people in Johnson County.”

         I am sick of it. Sick! So I have a new mission. I am going to call those people out – every time. And I am going to publicize that I called them out. And I am going to badger them until the day I die, trampled in a Peace protest!

         Seriously – I am sick of it. Johnson County is the most Democratic County in Iowa. We provide the largest margin in Iowa. Candidates milk this place for votes, volunteers, and money. Yet all we get in return is disrespect.

         Candidates seem to take a perverse joy in telling us we are too idealistic. It is almost as brazen as, “Thanks for the money, but I am not going to even TRY to give you anything you requested.” Except they don’t even say, “Thanks for the money.”

         So I am done. Done seeing and hearing the people of this County disrespected. Are we a well-educated group? Yes. Do we care about Labor issues? Yes. Do we care about the environment? Yes. Do we care about women’s healthcare? Yes. Are many of us LGBTQ? Yes. I could go on. Bottom line? We are every bit as “Iowan” as any other part of Iowa!

         Beware, statewide candidates, because my campaign is real! Johnson County deserves much better than it gets. I am certain we will continue to provide votes, volunteers, and money. But be careful - we might just start demanding a little more in return!



*DID YOU KNOW?  In 2000, population density in Johnson County was 181 people per square mile. By the 2010 Census, that number had increased to 222 people per square mile. It will be interesting to see where that number lands following the 2020 Census!




Anyone interested in learning more about County government should take a look at the County website-

"Sullivan’s Salvos" is sent once per week to any interested party. It will give a brief update on issues of interest to Johnson County residents.

These messages come solely from Rod Sullivan, and neither represents the viewpoints of the whole Board of Supervisors nor those of groups or individuals otherwise mentioned.

If you do NOT want the weekly E-mail, simply reply to this message, and type "unsubscribe" in the subject line.

If you know anyone else who might be interested, just forward this message. They can E-mail me at rodsullivan@mchsi.com with "subscribe" in the subject line.

As always, feel free to contact me at 354-7199 or rodsullivan@mchsi.com. I look forward to serving you!

---Rod






February 8, 2018

Sullivan’s Salvos     2/13/18



In this edition:


*City Fed Chili Supper
*Henri Harper Soul Food Dinner
*Bowl For Kids’ Sake
*Caucus Divisions
*Dem Gubernatorial Race
*Minimum Wage Report
*Did You Know?



*City Fed Chili Supper
Join us Thursday, February 15th, from 6-8 pm for our annual chili supper! Family and friends are welcome. Bring a dish if you like!

Enjoy great food, music, the company of like-minded individuals, and celebrate all that is good about labor! The labor movement needs to come together, and there is no time like the present! Look forward to seeing you all there!



*Henri Harper Soul Food Dinner
The annual Henri Harper Soul Food Dinner is February 16 at 5 PM at the Robert A. Lee Recreation Center in downtown Iowa City. The dinner is free and open to the public. If you wish to donate, please see Facebook for the Go Fund Me site.



*Bowl For Kids’ Sake
The Sullivan for Supervisor team is once again raising money for Big Brothers Big Sisters of Johnson County by Bowling For Kids’ Sake on Saturday, February 24.

Bowl for Kids' Sake is Big Brothers Big Sisters largest national fundraiser, raising over $20 million annually for children in need across the country. Because of Bowl for Kids' Sake, more Bigs and Littles can be paired up, more friendships can be created and improved outlooks on life can be started.




*Caucus Divisions
The 2018 Iowa Caucuses are in the books, and the great division in the Party was – division. The big issue was whether or not to divide into preference groups.

As Caucus veterans know, in Presidential years, Iowa Democrats divide into Presidential preference groups. This impacts who gets seated at County, District, and State Conventions, and ultimately, which candidate gets Iowa’s 6 electoral votes.

Gubernatorial years are different. While the Caucus actually chooses which Presidential nominees we will support, our elections for Governor, US Senate, US House, and on down are decided by a primary election. Because the primary will (likely) select our nominees, there is no real need to divide into preference groups.

One of the challenges most Iowa Dems faced was not an issue in the Second Congressional District. In the other three Districts, the question was should we divide over Congress or Governor? You can only divide once! Here, because Congressman Loebsack was not challenged, the decision was easier.

So why the fight over whether or not to divide? I think there are a couple things going on.

First, Clinton vs. Sanders was and is hard on the Party. You can see why people who want to win in '18 do not want to relive '16. On the other hand, the question of "How do you win?" is legitimately up for debate. There are differing answers to that question, and sometimes those answers follow Clinton/Sanders lines.

 Secondly, every organization (not just political parties) struggles with the push and pull between fresh, new ideas and energy versus institutional knowledge and experience. If an organization is going to succeed, it must strike a balance with which the majority can live. That ain't easy!

         As it turned out, my Precinct (Iowa City 01) did choose to divide. As a Precinct that votes in excellent numbers, we were entitled to 8 delegates. We had 45 attendees (plus about 10 youth attendees). So doing the Caucus math, a group required 7 people to meet the state rule of 15% viability.

         We had two groups that had exactly 7 members, thereby earning a single delegate, representing Boulton and Hubbell. We had two other groups, representing Glasson and Uncommitted, that each earned 3 delegates.

         So, did this matter? Who knows. It certainly did not feel like a big deal, though it clearly rankled a few Caucus-goers. I would say that the MOST important piece was what happened next:

         Our WHOLE CAUCUS stuck around to the end, discussing and voting upon several platform planks. I hope this is the type of unity Democrats will demonstrate through November of 2018!



*Dem Gubernatorial Race
         We just talked Caucuses. Let’s move on. If you are a Democrat and you are reading this? Please get out and vote in the June Primary. Work your tail off for the candidate of your choice. And after that primary, please suck it up and support the Democratic nominee!

         If you cannot do that? You are willing to do great harm to the people of this State. Think about that. Is your anger worth it?



*Minimum Wage Report
         The Gazette spent some time in last Sunday’s edition discussing the impacts of the Johnson County Minimum Wage Ordinance. While I was glad to see them take up the issue, I found the timing strange. This coverage comes over a month after the report was released. The Gazette never had a reporter at the release of the report. They never interviewed myself of any other Supervisor. They never let us know in any way that this whole piece was coming. So it was a bit weird.

         On the negative side, there was a ridiculous response from a gentleman associated with the Iowa Restaurant Association. He claimed we should ignore the overall data, and instead focus upon a couple specific anecdotes. That is THE EXACT OPPOSITE of how governments should use data!

I take a bit of issue with the way the Editorial dismissed an increase in employment activity as “not supported by the data.” It wasn’t disproven. Moreover, one of the biggest bogeymen opponents trot out is a loss of jobs. That did not happen.

On the positive side, the Editorial Board agreed with the Supervisors on several points. And Peter Fisher summed up the data in a separate piece that really illustrates the benefits of the higher wage.

         Remember, you can read the report for yourself at the County webpage: www.johnson-county.com.



*DID YOU KNOW?  I attended Iowa Caucuses in 1972, ’76, and ’80 as a kid with my father. I skipped 1984 to chase a girl. I have attended every Caucus since 1988, including the “off years.”



Anyone interested in learning more about County government should take a look at the County website-

"Sullivan’s Salvos" is sent once per week to any interested party. It will give a brief update on issues of interest to Johnson County residents.

These messages come solely from Rod Sullivan, and neither represents the viewpoints of the whole Board of Supervisors nor those of groups or individuals otherwise mentioned.

If you do NOT want the weekly E-mail, simply reply to this message, and type "unsubscribe" in the subject line.

If you know anyone else who might be interested, just forward this message. They can E-mail me at rodsullivan@mchsi.com with "subscribe" in the subject line.

As always, feel free to contact me at 354-7199 or rodsullivan@mchsi.com. I look forward to serving you!

---Rod






February 1, 2018

Sullivan’s Salvos     2/6/18



In this edition:


*We’re Number One!
*Supporting Candidates
*Consistency With Candidates
*Did You Know?



*We’re Number One!
Johnson County was recently named No. 1 in the state for workplace safety by the Iowa Municipalities Workers’ Compensation Association (IMWCA).

As an employer, Johnson County has the best Experience Modification Factor (EMF) out of 79 counties in the IMWCA program and the second best overall EMF of the nearly 500 entities and organizations in IMWCA. The EMF is based on an entity’s workplace injury history—both the number of injuries and the severity of those injuries.

Johnson County employs more than 550 individuals who provide a variety of services to County residents, including law enforcement, ambulance, road and bridge maintenance, public transportation, elections, social services, conservation, among others.  

“By continuing to be a leader in the safety of its employees, Johnson County has not only reduced its annual premiums by 40 percent of the national average per NCCI, but IMWCA has provided additional credits because they felt it wasn’t enough of a discount. After all of the credits are put together, Johnson County is only paying a third of the national average for a similarly sized entity,” Kyle Austen, agent and partner of Insurance Associates of Iowa City, said. “While commitment to safety can be measured in a dollar amount on the policy, what can’t be measured in this figure is the improvement of the employees’ quality of life as they go home each night safe and happy.”

Each year, more than four million workers suffer serious job-related injuries or illnesses and 4,000 Americans die in work-related incidents. These incidents not only hurt workers and their families, but also negatively impact business and the economy. Safer organizations enjoy increased productivity, higher employee satisfaction and a better reputation, while lowering workers’ compensation and healthcare costs and reducing the amount of lost time. 



*Supporting Candidates
What does it mean to “support” a candidate? I was part of a Facebook discussion on this topic, and thought it was an interesting exercise. Obviously, one type of “support” you can offer a candidate is your vote. Personally, I have never viewed *just* voting for a candidate as “supporting” that candidate. (I have friends who disagree.)

To me, “supporting” a candidate means going beyond just voting. It means doing something public. Doing something public means you are taking a personal risk. You are willing to be held accountable. That is a big step for some people – a very bright line.

And this makes sense. The public nature means you are opening yourself up to criticism. You have to really believe in the person to be willing to open yourself up. You risk disagreements with family, friends, and neighbors.

In my mind, writing a letter to the editor, putting up a sign, making a financial contribution, knocking doors, making phone calls, putting your opinions on your personal social media, putting your name on a public list, attending public events, serving on a committee, volunteering in other ways – these are the ways in which you “support” a candidate. (I’m sure my list is not exhaustive, but you get the idea.)

Perhaps this is too personal for me. I have my own campaigns, and I definitely remember when a person offers support above and beyond voting. I have worked on scores of Federal, State, County, City, and School campaigns, and I definitely pay attention to the people who do more than vote. To me, the people who make those extra efforts are the “supporters”.

But, “supporter” is just a word. Perhaps you disagree. Perhaps you feel I have the right idea, and the wrong word. What are your thoughts?



*Consistency With Candidates
         There is another topic related to supporting candidates that deserves some discussion. I often hear people criticizing others over a lack of “consistency” when choosing which candidates to support. And I agree, because we are pretty much all inconsistent in this area to some degree.

         I spent years arguing for the Iowa Democratic Party to nominate a woman for Governor and/or Federal office. I really hoped Sally Pedersen would run after Governor Vilsack stepped down.

         But you know what? Iowa HAS a female Governor now. And I am horrified! I think Governor Reynolds is taking us down a disastrous path that might take a generation from which to recover. I wanted a woman for Governor, but I didn’t want THIS woman.

         There were lots of people who were adamant supporters of Hillary Clinton in 2016 whose reasoning was, “It is time for a woman.” Hard to argue. Except that many of the same people supported Obama over Clinton in 2008. Wasn’t it “Time for a Woman“ then?

Of course it was. This simply illustrates that our number one reason for voting in 2016 may not influence our 2018 vote at all. There can be perfectly good reasons to go a different direction. I just wish we were all a bit more honest about it.

Most people say something very similar to this: “All things being equal, I would choose an African American candidate.” But “all things being equal” is a completely subjective concept. That leaves it wide open as to whether or not all things ARE in fact equal. When you want the African American candidate, you will claim things were equal. When you want the white candidate, you will find an explanation that allows you to support the white candidate.

         I have typically voted for more progressive candidates. That is probably the first filter through which I look. And I would say I have been more consistent than most. But I do not ALWAYS choose the most progressive of the bunch. Sometimes the most progressive of the bunch is a terrible candidate!

         We are all hypocrites when choosing candidates. We say we want someone young; the next cycle we vote for someone in her 70s. We say we want someone smart; the next cycle we vote against a Princeton grad. We say we want people of color; the next cycle we overlook qualified African American candidates. We say we will only vote for a candidate who endorses universal health care; then we vote for someone who believes otherwise.

         We ALL do this. We are ALL hypocrites. The only questions are A) How big a hypocrite are you? And B) Will you admit it?

         I do wish the people supporting political candidates would be more honest about WHY they support the candidates they do. It would help eliminate a lot of the hypocrisy, and we wouldn’t have to walk around in this bubble of cognitive dissonance.

         That said, you can see why supporters do not do this. It is much easier to stand up and give a speech saying, “It is time for a woman on the Council” than to give a speech saying, “I absolutely hate that guy.” It doesn’t matter that you voted against the last seven women who ran for Council; it sounds better.

         When it comes to politics, Johnson County can be pretty “small town”. We all know who cheated on his spouse. We all know who fired whom. We all know whose kid went to jail. There are lifelong friendships, lifelong hatreds, and all different types of perceived slights. Candidates know who has worked against them in the past. Our politics can get quite parochial.

         My advice? People are going to vote for whomever they wish. If you are trying to convince someone to vote for your candidate, understand that the person you are speaking with is under no obligation to be consistent. Then be as honest as you can be. I think that is the best we can do.



*DID YOU KNOW?  Former Johnson County Supervisor Betty Ockenfels was involved in the two closest primary victories in modern Johnson County Supervisor history. Ockenfels defeated Bob Lynch by 37 votes to secure the final Supervisor nomination in the 1980 Democratic Party Primary, then defeated former Iowa City Mayor and Iowa State Senator Mary Neuhauser by 71 votes to secure the final spot in 1984.



Anyone interested in learning more about County government should take a look at the County website-

"Sullivan’s Salvos" is sent once per week to any interested party. It will give a brief update on issues of interest to Johnson County residents.

These messages come solely from Rod Sullivan, and neither represents the viewpoints of the whole Board of Supervisors nor those of groups or individuals otherwise mentioned.

If you do NOT want the weekly E-mail, simply reply to this message, and type "unsubscribe" in the subject line.

If you know anyone else who might be interested, just forward this message. They can E-mail me at rodsullivan@mchsi.com with "subscribe" in the subject line.

As always, feel free to contact me at 354-7199 or rodsullivan@mchsi.com. I look forward to serving you!

---Rod