Rod Sullivan, Supervisor, Johnson County, Iowa

Previous Posts


July 19, 2018

Sullivan’s Salvos     7/24/18

In this edition:

*No Salvos Next Week!
*Labor Center
*Behavioral Health Urgent Care Center (BHUCC)
*Did You Know?

*No Salvos Next Week!
         There will be no Salvos next week. Expect your next edition (dated 8/7/18) around August 2ndor 3rd.

*Labor Center
         I am extremely disheartened by UI President Harreld’s decision to close the UI Labor Center. This decision is shortsighted, and will negatively impact worker safety and training statewide. It reinforces the idea that education is a commodity to be purchased by the wealthy, rather than a commitment of the state to all its’ citizens. I sincerely hope this decision will be reconsidered.

         And I would be lying if I said this wasn’t personal. The people at the Labor Center are my friends. My heart aches.

         It is also important to note that other UI Centers were eliminated. The process used to make these cuts was neither transparent nor effective; the UI blows through money at a remarkable rate. Almost every employee could point to an area where $100,000 could be saved. Why not enlist their help, and get their buy in? Save money AND preserve programs!

         What can you do? I will give you the same answer I have given before: VOTE!

*Behavioral Health Urgent Care Center (BHUCC)
         The Board recently voted to purchase 5.34 acres of land on Southgate Avenue in SE Iowa City for the purpose of constructing a Behavioral Health Urgent Care Center (BHUCC). The purchase price was $1.35 million - $5.80 per square foot. The vote was 4-1 to move forward with the project.

You may have heard this project referred to as an “Access Center”, or “Crisis Intervention Training” (CIT). Both terms refer to related projects. (We will get to that later.)

In general, the BHUCC is a result of the efforts of former Johnson County Jail Alternatives Coordinator Jessica Peckover. Jessica had visited a program in Bexar County, Texas (San Antonio) that had done a remarkable job of redirecting people with mental health and/or substance abuse issues from the jail and emergency room to more appropriate services. Jessica came away impressed, and convinced a number of Johnson County folks to visit as well. (I was one of those visitors.)

The program in Bexar County is a true win-win-win. First, and most importantly, sick people get the care they need. Secondly, officers are able to drop off patients quickly and get back on the streets, increasing public safety. Finally, local governments actually save money serving these folks. Win-win-win.

We decided to move forward. That process started with sending local law enforcement officers to San Antonio to be trained in Crisis Intervention Training (CIT). After sending dozens of officers from various agencies, we felt comfortable doing the training ourselves here in Johnson County. As of this writing, over 90% of all law enforcement officers in Johnson County have been trained on CIT. 

But training officers is only one piece of the puzzle. We also need to provide those officers an option other than jail or the ER. That alternative is the BHUCC. Until and unless this is built, patients will not be helped, officers cannot fully implement their training, and any savings will be negligible.

The BHUCC is joint project including but not limited to Johnson County; a number of cities, including Iowa City and Coralville; numerous local nonprofits; and the Department of Emergency Medicine at the UIHC.

This was not a question of, “Are we doing a BHUCC?” The County and Cities have already made that decision, and already invested tremendous amounts of resources to that end. These include:

*Literally hundreds of hours of meetings;
*Dozens of trips by dozens of people to San Antonio
*Every public safety officer in Johnson County save just a few has received extensive training on CIT. 

The decision to create the BHUCC was made a long time ago. A “no” vote means backing out of that commitment. 

A “no” vote is the equivalent of a big “screw you” to law enforcement officers, who have begged for help for decades. A “no” vote is the equivalent of a big “screw you” to family members, who have begged for help for decades. A “no” vote is the equivalent of a big “screw you” to people who would be served by the BHUCC, who have needed help for decades. A “no” vote helps no one.

It has been mentioned that a portion of this property flooded in 2008, and was in the 100-year flood plain. This is true. Despite hyperbole to the contrary, this property has flooded just twice in 50 years. I challenge anyone to prove otherwise. 

But as a condition of purchase, the property is being built up to one above the 2008 flood levels. This means that unless we have a flood event bigger than 2008, the flood risk has been mitigated. There are additional things we can do – concrete floors, raised electrical service, air conditioning on the roof – that will further reduce any risks.

Frankly, if we have a flood bigger than 2008, we will have other things about which we need to worry. You can never prepare for every eventuality. We have taken the appropriate steps in this case.

What’s more, if 2008 is the standard we are going to follow, we should move out of the current Administration, Health and Human Services, and Ambulance/Medical Examiner Buildings. All these locations were cut off by floodwaters in 2008. Yet I have not heard that suggested.

Let’s even go so far as to say that this property floods every June. I would argue that having the BHUCC eleven out of every twelve months would be worth it! Right now, we have a BHUCC ZERO months per year. Eleven out of every twelve months would really help people! 

Another objection is that it would be cheaper to renovate an existing building. That would be great, if it was true. It is not.We have reviewed every building on the market, and some that aren’t even for sale. There is no good fit. It is clearly going to be cheaper to build to suit. That is not my opinion – that is the opinion of experts. People who say otherwise are wrong, plain and simple.

This particular location has several advantages: It is close to the Crisis Center, Shelter House, and Prelude, all of which are going to be key players in the project. Law enforcement officers like the location. It offers the opportunity to both build what we need now and to expand in the future, if necessary. Similarly, we can build separate buildings if state rules and regs end up requiring it. It is on a bus line. And the price was pretty reasonable.

The Board did not reach these conclusions alone – we enlisted the help of local Realtor Jeff Edberg, who, with all due respect to the other fine folks in the field, is the top Commercial Realtor in Johnson County. Jeff knows this business, knows this particular site, and felt this was a very good deal.

It is pretty rare that any decision is risk free. There is always some level of risk. There are also risks in failing to act. We have waited long enough. It is time to act.

Again, a “no” vote does not help law enforcement officers, who have begged for help for decades. A “no” vote does not help family members, who have begged for help for decades. A “no” vote does not help people who would be served by the BHUCC, who have needed help for decades. A “no” vote helps no one.

I am proud of the work we have done so far, and proud of my vote on this property. People with mental illnesses and their families deserve better. It is time we took this step.

*DID YOU KNOW? The UI Labor Center was founded in 1951.

Anyone interested in learning more about County government should take a look at the County website- 

"Sullivan’s Salvos" is sent once per week to any interested party. It will give a brief update on issues of interest to Johnson County residents.

These messages come solely from Rod Sullivan, and neither represents the viewpoints of the whole Board of Supervisors nor those of groups or individuals otherwise mentioned.

If you do NOT want the weekly E-mail, simply reply to this message, and type "unsubscribe" in the subject line. 

If you know anyone else who might be interested, just forward this message. They can E-mail me at with "subscribe" in the subject line.

As always, feel free to contact me at 354-7199 or I look forward to serving you!



Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home