SULLIVAN'S SALVOS
November 18, 2021
Sullivan’s Salvos 11/23/21
In this edition:
*Happy Thanksgiving!
*Congratulations Danelle!
*Big Personal News
*ARPA Part 1
*Did You Know?
*Happy Thanksgiving!
Happy Thanksgiving to Salvos readers! In many ways, Thanksgiving is my favorite holiday. (Imagine that coming from a fat guy, huh?)
Actually, I love the idea of giving thanks. It is a simple act that does not happen enough.
While I am at it – thanks to all of you who read Salvos each week. And a special thanks to those of you who follow up by sharing your thoughts. I appreciate it! Happy Thanksgiving!
*Congratulations Danelle!
Congratulations to Danelle Essing who retired after 35 years at the County Attorney’s Office! For many years, Danelle has been the glue that keeps things together. She is a smart, talented, thoughtful person whose presence will be greatly missed.
It stings to lose great employees like Danelle, but I am very happy for her. Congratulations Danelle! Enjoy your retirement!
*Big Personal News
Big news from the Fath/Sullivan household....After almost 21 years at 2326 E. Court Street, we are going to be moving. We just purchased 514 North Linn Street in Iowa City and will be moving in early 2022.
The new house is really cool, and the location is exciting. Think three blocks straight north of Pagliai's. I refer to it as an "estuary" where the fresh water of University influence hits the saltwater of townie living. That will be a big change for us!
While moving is exciting, every change has positives and negatives. The toughest thing, honestly, will be leaving Dan and Beth Daly, who have become two of our best friends over the past 20+ years.
That is about it for now. Those of you who know me well know that I get pretty emotional about these types of things. So I'll leave it at this for now.
*ARPA Part 1
You have probably heard that Johnson County and all our cities have received generous funding from the federal government through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). In the case of Johnson County, we are getting just over $29.3 million dollars, half of which has arrived, and half of which is coming next May.
I am going to write about ARPA funding, but it will take the form of a five-part piece. In today’s first installment, we’ll discuss big picture considerations as to how the money gets spent.
The decision as to how this money is spent lies with the Board of Supervisors. The question of how to spend the money is a bit of a hot topic in the community. Needless to say, there are many approaches we can take.
There are about 153,000 residents of Johnson County. We could just take the $14,600,000 we get this year, and write every person a check for $95. Then we could do the same thing next May. I think you can see that by doing so, we would achieve almost nothing. There is strength in collective action, and there is strength in collective funding efforts.
On the other hand, you could take the 100 poorest residents, and give each one $146,000. That would be really good for those 100 people. But it would not improve things very much for the 152,900 residents who were left out.
Obviously, a balanced approach is the way to get the best bang for our buck. I think it is also critically important that we focus upon those most in need. That leads to another question – who, exactly, is the neediest among us?
I used to work with people with intellectual (and other) disabilities. I know people who cannot breathe without mechanical assistance. I know people who cannot eat without mechanical assistance. I know people who require around the clock nursing care.
Most of these folks are dirt poor. (One has to be poor to qualify for Medicaid, which covers most of our long-term care.) However, just a few of these folks are wealthy. So, I ask you – who is needier? A person who has some money but can neither breathe nor eat without assistance, or a person who has no money but can care for themselves? Does it matter if the person with disabilities is housed if the other person is not?
If you use Maslow as a guide, you might first provide help to those who need food, then shelter. That is actually a decent place to start, but it oversimplifies situations that are usually more complex, and it does nothing “upstream” to prevent future cases of hunger and homelessness.
Do we invest in seniors, to whom we owe a great debt, or do we invest in children, hoping to prevent future problems? Should we invest in job training or substance abuse counseling? Mental health care or domestic violence prevention? Services for immigrants or food pantries? How do all of these groups stack up against environmental concerns, which might just kill us all?
The answer is pretty simple: All of these concerns are extremely important. And Johnson County works really hard to address them all.
Assuming we do take a balanced approach, we will not completely solve any single problem. To illustrate: We could spend the whole $14,600,000 on building affordable housing. That might build about 100 units, which would be an incredible improvement. It might purchase 200 existing units. But 100 units will not end the affordable housing crisis in Johnson County. Nor will 200 units. There are a couple thousand names on the waiting list for Section 8 in Johnson County alone. To completely address our affordable housing crisis, we need the coordinated efforts of local, state, and federal governments.
Unfortunately, the State of Iowa under Kim Reynolds has done next to nothing to help those in need. The Federal government had not done much either, until ARPA came along. I know that as a county, we are constantly asked to pick up the funding for something that the State of Feds decided to cut. And to be honest, we just don’t have the resources.
Local government cannot afford to make up for everything the Feds get wrong. We should have universal health care coverage, but the County cannot fix that. We should have universal free childcare, but the County cannot fix that. We should universal paid sick leave, but the County cannot fix that. We should include all workers in unemployment insurance, but the County cannot fix that.
I was recently in some conversations regarding sick leave. The State of Iowa made local ordinances addressing sick leave illegal. That happened as part of the same local control bill where they revoked our local minimum wage. So we cannot mandate businesses offer it. If we could, I would vote for it.
What the County CAN do is take this generous sum of one-time money and make investments that improve the lives of our residents. And it is up to the Board of Supervisors, after listening to residents from all walks of life, to make those decisions. We will not make everyone happy. But we are going to do our best.
In the next installment, we will discuss bonus pay for county employees.
*DID YOU KNOW? The annual tradition (which I detest) of a “Presidential Pardon" for a turkey began under President Reagan.
Anyone interested in learning more about County government should take a look at the County website-
"Sullivan’s Salvos" is sent once per week to any interested party. It will give a brief update on issues of interest to Johnson County residents.
These messages come solely from Rod Sullivan, and neither represents the viewpoints of the whole Board of Supervisors nor those of groups or individuals otherwise mentioned.
If you do NOT want the weekly E-mail, simply reply to this message, and type "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
If you know anyone else who might be interested, just forward this message. They can E-mail me at rodsullivan29@gmail.com with "subscribe" in the subject line.
As always, feel free to contact me at 354-7199 or rodsullivan29@gmail.com. I look forward to serving you!
---Rod
posted by Rod Sullivan @ 1:43 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home